WSIS Plenary: Re: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [Wsis-pct] IPJ: US &

Re: AW: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Re: [Wsis-pct] IPJ: US & Japan Upset Consensus for Development Agenda at WIPO

From: Jacqueline Morris <jacqueline.morris_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu 28 Jul 2005 07:38:00 AM AST
Message-Id: <131293a2050728043815b7c5c5@mail.gmail.com>

[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
_______________________________________

The US participated in the WGIG - US Reps were at all WGIG open
sessions, and even though no US govt rep was on the WGIG (neither were
many countries, and India esp was very upset at not having a Govt
member on the WGIG) the US POV was very well represented in the
discussions.
Jacqueline

On 7/27/05, Ralf Bendrath <bendrath@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
> _______________________________________
>
> Good points, Rainer and Wolfgang. The special position of the US in many
> regards (WIPO, UNESCO, IG) is an interesting phenomenon and needs more
> discussion.
>
> Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote:
> > And more will come. Looking forward, I see a great conflict between G
> > 20 + China and US on IG during PrepCom3, PrepCom3+ and PrepCom3++
> > without any agreement in Tunis. My two scenarios for Tunis are:
> > a. failure with a continuation of the discussion and
> > b. failure without a continuation of the discussion.
>
> The difference is: In UNESCO and WIPO, this all is taking place within the
> UN context and in order to change the policy of a UN organization (which
> indirectly would change policy of member states). ICANN is different, as
> there the US can just stand still and do nothing. They do not even need
> veto power, as the other governments have no real decision-making power.
> Therefore, if we want the US to leave WIPO and/or UNESCO, we are weakening
> multilateral structures. We will then not be able to ask for a more
> internationalized (W)ICANN. The US will never join it. They never even
> joined the WGIG.
>
> What is still not really clear to me: What is the position of the EU or
> Japan to these issues? And does it count?
>
> Ralf
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary@wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>

-- 
______________________
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary@wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
Received on Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:38:00 -0400

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon 01 Aug 2005 03:00:36 AM AST AST