Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Draft input to GFC

[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people. Your cooperation is highly appreciated]
_______________________________________

karen banks ha scritto:
> Amb Karklins: (some time later)
>
> on followup: I heard the intervention from Israel re resolution 57/270B.
> We have agreed in principle (though agreement is bracketed) that we will
> try to address follow up to IG issues separately to follow up to other
> WSIS related issues as they are very different and require specific
> knowledge. We know that in 2 years we have learned a lot, how internet
> functions, how it is managed etc, and they are not related directly to
> other issues we address in the WSIS process.
>
> In my view, would be productive to look at follow up to IG separately
> from other WSIS related issues, which could be arranged in accordance
> with res 57/270B
> ------

Given this point, shouldn't we try to get this stated in the draft para
33? (Or at least raise the issue.)

-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary@wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary