Re: [WSIS CS-Plenary] On the subject

Dear Robert
I did support your views and suggestions upon CS Bureau and I go on supporting them strongly. If the post-WSIS process is to produce useful contributions to ICT for Development with active CS participation, a profound revamping of this body is needed and urgent.
Best
Jean-Louis Fullsack

> Message du 20/02/06 21:54
> De : "Robert Guerra"
> A : bureau@wsis-cs.org, plenary@wsis-cs.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : [WSIS CS-Plenary] On the subject
>
> [Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for specific people]
>
> Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic translation of this message!
> _______________________________________
>
> Curious if anyone has comments on the "bureau" references made by the
> chair and others at the IGF consultation last week in Geneva.
>
>
>
>
> Now if a CS "bureau" is formed for the IGF, then I would suggest that it
> not built on nor modeled on the CSB which existed during the WSIS process.
>
> May I recall that I've made two, i think even three calls over the
> past months for the existing Civil Society Bureau to be reviewed.
>
> From my point of view, it has a real lack of legitimacy. It's members
> were elected and/or appointed long ago, it is over populated by Tunisian
> NGOs and agents, and currently run effectively by only one organization.
>
> keen to hear comments of others.
>
> regards
>
> Robert
>
> Dr. Francis MUGUET wrote:
> >
> > Hello / Bonsoir
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please find below a message recently sent by Charles Geiger to all
> >> missions and WSIS stakeholders concerning up-coming meetings organised
> >> by ITU on facilitation for Action Lines C2 and C5.
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> Plenary mailing list
> Plenary@wsis-cs.org
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
>
>
Received on Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:12:11 +0100 (CET)