(no subject)

paises developing. United nations have participation in the pursuit
processes.

Australia:

Pending elements, the dispositions of good government, must be
referred to accelerate the benefits.

The present structure works suitably.

Australia has difficulties to generate proposals of devices that were
identified, given the Internet amplitude.

Therefore Australia guide to follow with the reinforcing of the
present structures, according to Geneva, considering the reality of
the parts, asi like its members and competitions.

The summit tendria that to consider the resources existing and to make
them a priority: to fulfill the goals established and the goals of the
millenium.

The questions relative to Internet we must assure us that we can reach
at a consensus, and practicos results, mainly creation of capacities.
As far as the antecedents, the proposal of Argentina is very util,
because Integra the common positions. We hoped that interested others
make proposal in this way.

Chairman.

Revision of DT/10 Rev 4.

Agreements a forum without powers, to decision making. To review
presented/displayed documents.

A1 positions. To maintain to avoid the change, not to interfere with
the system because it has worked well.

A2 position. To maintain the status-quo, if there is no a clear
formulation, that quizas habra another forum and quizas another space
of I engage in a dialog.

Other groups say that we return to the WGIG Report and it is chosen
between the 4 models.

Not habra votings, but works by consensuses.

Progressive, evolutionary approach, as it is possible to be put in
practices it, given the differences of opinion.

Uruguay said that there is to synthesize, has to arrive at something
concrete, to make specific positions, to see that it is what we
decided in prepcom, to see since the process of negotiations has gone,
in which all the implied parts.

There is another group, that says that not deberia ningun period of
supervision. Other that say that if deberia to have this period of
supervision.

We are 2 but and is question of politica will, of realiasmo, quizas we
must be making some agreements, but we must arrive at something, we
must be able to present/display something, when attempt to develop a
common text, there are times that I want to dectantar itself by
something, but sometimes are dificil, soon we will have to speak of
the future, is an approach that if says, there is to do something in
gfuturo, that we have a development mechanism that is centered in the
Internet government. A group that says: neither now nor never.

There is another reference to the gin principles, are a movement, he
is but the simple thing, and when we spoke of the principles of
pursuit and supervision, quizas can help us. Now the idea is that we
did not need concrete solutions, that we did not need ningun step, but
all that veria influcenciados by the politica voluntada one.

Some aspects of the development already treated, is a common
denominator, that foot that the development treated.

I want to be objective.

I want that they are creative and reflective.

Brazil:

To begin to construct from its reflections. The delegation of Brazil
considers that the document does not reflect anything of which
habiamos proposed, we think that it is the unico way to follow the
debate.

Attempt to understand its logica. Those that estan in favor of the
change and the one that this with the status-quo. But ours feeling, is
that those that estan in favor of the status-quo do not even mean that
they do not esten in favor of the change. We thought that we must
avoid the burocratica supervision. If we have in mind that the
governments want to overload the system, I believe that if, the
government must maintain outside the system, all the governments. But
if all remain outside the system, gobeirno that now occupies the
coordination the system, although requests that the status-quo stays,
changed.
I like much the established summary, now already outstanding all the
points, therefore we must confront all the problems facing which we
have a little work but we must do it exceletne.

The status-quo does not have to stay, we see since we make to improve
the situation. Ningun change, this enough dificil to accept itself. We
needed to improve the present state with improvements. It is necessary
to assure that Internet is safe and in agreement, until now we agree,
but we have problems, in agreement advances the future, we will face
them.

The government must be able to participate in questions of politicas
you publish, in tecnicas/tecnologicas questions does not have because
to participate the government, but who the government must create
propitious surroundings so that the industry.

China also this in one economia of market. We are not trying to face
paises one against others.

To discuss for something, to obtain something, to put to us in
agreement. Of the question of the Forum. But it seems that there is
certain consensus, that he is what hara, as sera his mandate, these
are the subjects that we must consider, we must obtain the consensus,
i myself who work in question of multilateralistmo, nobody has defined
consensus, consensus means to do something and to receive something.
The law for all.

Chairman:

To present/display answers although they are not definitive, we must
have a progressive exposition. If the bad sera result, we do not
separate. All we are responsible before the citizens, reason why
stamos working in this for several anhos, this has not had to be a
lost opportunity, knows that he is dificil to obtain a consensus, does
not mean unamimity but either to ignore the opinions, we did not need
to have an almost universal ample agreement.

Saudi Arabia:

to eliminate the idea to maintain staus-quo.

Chairman:

but the simple thing, to adopt the document of the WGIG but we cannot.

Iran:

Instead of rejecting the showed ideas, it wanted to place opening of
sights. If so single we showed our support, without putting it in
practices we are in the heart of the matter. after 4 anhos we will not
have advanced to progressive or the evolutionary thing.

Senegal: xx

Singapur
 

Ghana: Africa wants a gradual approach facing the
internationalization, democratica management and what it is understood
paulativamente by evolution, in an amount of anhos to settle down, but
a gradual approach, we create in an intermediate position neither
staus-quo nor radical change. Tambein gustaria me who we are inspired
by the points in common for a rules of work in common.

Aim of session.

_______________________________________________ Plenary mailing list
Plenary@wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
Received on Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:23:52 -0500